Chattanooga
State Technical Community College
Institute
for Teaching and Learning
SURVEY RESPONSES OF FACULTY AND STAFF
January 7, 2000
QUESTIONS:
1. What do the words "learning community"
mean to you?
2. Briefly describe an innovative approach to teaching and
learning you would like to have the ITL investigate.
3. How do you learn best?
4. How do your students learn best?
5. Which teaching and learning strategy involving technology
would you like to be able to use in Fall 2000?
6. What is a research question on learning that the Institute
should address?
7. How would you define quality as it relates to teaching
and learning?
8. How should the Institute strengthen relationships among
members of our learning community?
Comments:
1. What do the words "learning community" mean to you?
2. Briefly describe an innovative approach to teaching and learning you would like to have the ITL investigate.
4. How do your students learn best?
5. Which teaching and learning strategy involving technology would you like to be able to use in Fall 2000?
6. What is a research question on learning that the Institute should address?
7. How would you define quality as it relates to teaching and learning?
8. How should the Institute strengthen relationships among members of our learning community?
I would like to get back to "education", transferring my knowledge of something to someone else. I am not an "entertainer" and I don't feel education should be handled as "entertainment" because "that's the way they learn". This "entertainment approach" to learning has "come back to haunt us". Don't take this to mean all classes should be boring and taught on the chalkboard without technology. However, Maybe that is the best way for some things to be learned. Call me old fashioned, or contrary to high technology, but I feel there is no substitute for the printed word on "paper" in the traditional (or digital) form, book, newspaper, laser print, correspondence, web page, whatever. There is also no substitute for putting the written word on paper whether that be in the traditional form or it's digital counterpart. Quite simply, if you don't read you can't write. You can't even speak at a level of competence typically expected in business today. If you can't write or speak, you can't articulate very effectively either. In today's world that means you can't communicate, at least on a level that is being taken seriously. It's that simple. After all, students are adults and should be treated as such. They (students) have decided to go to college to "get an education" and should, at this point in their lives, be responsible for the decisions they make. They need to GROW UP and ACT LIKE ADULTS. If they don't wish to come to class or do the homework and projects, fine, so be it, but they should also accept the consequences. As instructors we should not have to "tow the line" for their decisions. We shouldn't have to call them to remind them to come to class or find out why they haven't been there. They know by now they have access, all they have to do is pick up the phone, drop us an e-mail, stick a note on the door, have another student tell us, heck, even send us a letter, God forbid they should have to write something on their own initiative.
My personal proof of what I feel lies at the root of all this in my own junior and high school education. I grew in this so-called Gen X group and have discovered that the group of individuals I was personally educated with (these are not all personal friends) have all been fairly successful not only their careers but in their lives. As a group we all went to public school in Tennessee and took all the traditional classes, read the various classics, wrote the term papers, gave the speeches, take math through algebra and geometry, take chemistry, biology and a foreign language to boot. We learned how to think analytically, tackle tough assignments, solve problems and deal with "life's little difficulties" because we were expected to. Not just by our parents and teachers but also because of what seemed an innate desire to get ahead in life and the "peer pressure" to one-up our buddies grade wise. We wanted to succeed.
During this same period "new" forms of education were introduced. A fair number of this group took the "new" forms of education because it was viewed as being progressive, an easier way to learn, etc. (eg: new math, social sciences, everybody is a winner/star #@!!, etc.) As a group these folks don't seem to have fared as well. Somewhere in all of this the motivation to achieve was seemingly degraded or really down played. Today a large percentage of them would not be called successful in terms of life in general. They don't have what typically would be referred to as a "career", are what most employers refer to as "unmotivated, or lazy, unprofessional" and most haven't ever really applied themselves to successfully complete any kind of goal. Dare I say most have never even set any personal goals and, on a side note, probably even be late for their own funeral. Why, this is my theory, because they were not required to in high school or junior high. Nowhere outside the home, and maybe not even there. I can however name a few exceptions but….
In my opinion, for what it's worth, the reason for this is that these
folks never had to deal with any real difficulties in terms of "learning"
things "they" thought were not necessary; they never had to deal
with a teacher they didn't really care for because the teacher was "too
hard" or required you to do "too much work outside class or on
your own" or you had to write a term paper with footnotes, etc. They
never got to see class grades posted on the wall for all to see or dealt
with the "peer pressure/competition in the classroom" or developed
the desire to achieve anything beyond "what they had to". Rather
they would ask, "Is this ok?" Translated, that meant doing the
least amount they could get away with and letting someone else take the
responsibility for the decision to do so. Looking back I'm glad my parents
had the foresight to explain to me what they thought the short comings
of this "new" form of education might be. Even though I didn't
necessarily agree at the time I had the faith to believe in what they were
saying. I vividly recall several consistent reactions from friends in regard
to why I took the "hard classes"; "why do you put up with
that, why do you work so hard on that, my teacher don't care what I do
as long as I'm there, I watched another crappy movie or TV show today about
some dumb…., what do you mean you have to read Steinbeck's… or Upton who?,
we get to watch stuff on TV instead!" In short I feel these people
never really developed any self discipline or a sincere interest in anything
to the point of being motivated to accomplish it. They never read anything
and as a result they didn't write much either (the ones I know personally
anyway). They never developed any RESPONSIBILITY. Why, I'm not sure, but
my suspicion leads me to suspect it was because they never had to be responsible
or were never held responsible, especially during their formative years
of schooling.
Return to top